Mass surveillance and Snoopers' Charter

Liberty begins legal proceedings in People vs Snoopers’ Charter challenge

Posted on 28 Feb 2017

Liberty to challenge powers which let the state monitor everybody’s web history and email, text and phone records, and hack computers, phones and tablets on an industrial scale.

Liberty has today issued a landmark legal challenge against the Government’s extreme mass surveillance regime, setting in motion a judicial review of the Investigatory Powers Act.

Liberty is challenging the unprecedented “bulk” surveillance powers contained in the Act – which lets the state monitor everybody’s web history and email, text and phone records, and hack computers, phones and tablets on an industrial scale.

The human rights campaigning organisation sent a formal letter before action to the Government on 20 December last year – but has still not received a substantive response. Liberty has now applied to the High Court for permission to proceed.

The challenge is being crowdfunded via CrowdJustice, and has received widespread public support. In January, Liberty raised more than £50,000 from the public in less than a week – smashing its initial target of just £10,000.

More than 200,000 people signed a petition calling for the Act’s repeal after it passed late last year.

Silkie Carlo, Policy Officer at Liberty, said: “This is our first step towards getting rid of the most intrusive surveillance regime of any democracy in history.

“The powers we’re fighting undermine everything that’s core to our freedom and democracy – our right to protest, to express ourselves freely and to a fair trial, our free press, privacy and cybersecurity. But with so much public support behind us, we’re hopeful we will be able to persuade our courts to restrain the more authoritarian tendencies of this Government.”

Liberty will argue that the following powers breach the British people’s rights:

  • Bulk and ‘thematic’ hacking – the Act lets police and agencies access, control and alter electronic devices like computers, phones and tablets on an industrial scale, regardless of whether their owners are suspected of involvement in crime – leaving them vulnerable to further attack by hackers.
  • Bulk interception of communications content – the Act lets the state read texts, online instant messages and emails, and listen in on calls en masse, without requiring suspicion of criminal activity.
  • Bulk acquisition of everybody’s communications data and internet history – the Act forces communications companies and service providers to retain and hand over records of everybody’s emails, phone calls and texts and entire web browsing history to state agencies to store, data-mine and profile at its will.
  • Bulk personal datasets – the Act lets agencies acquire and link vast databases held by the public or private sector. These contain details on religion, ethnic origin, sexuality, political leanings and health problems, potentially on the entire population – and are ripe for abuse and discrimination.

Liberty has instructed Bhatt Murphy Solicitors in this case.

In December, the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) issued a historic judgment in a separate case brought by Tom Watson MP, represented by Liberty.

It ruled the UK Government is breaking the law by indiscriminately collecting the nation’s internet activity and phone records and letting hundreds of public bodies grant themselves access to these personal details with no suspicion of serious crime and no independent sign-off – effectively rendering significant parts of the Investigatory Powers Act unlawful.

Contact 0207 378 3656 / 07973 831 128 /

I'm looking for advice on this

Did you know Liberty offers free human rights legal advice?

What are my rights on this?

Find out more about your rights and how the Human Rights Act protects them

Did you find this content useful?

Help us make our content even better by letting us know whether you found this page useful or not

Need advice or information?